By Pete Ford


There is no doubt that HDR software has changed the way many people think about photography. I think that HDR photos are the biggest advancement to the craft since the digital camera first came out over 20 years ago. That said, for all of the fantastic things associated with the art of high dynamic range, there are some pretty major drawbacks was well.

While many will argue there are a lot of downsides, here are a few of the things in particular that jump out at me.

Noisy Images. The more photos you pile on top of one another, the more noise you're going to get. This can be difficult if you don't have a specific plugin to correct the new found image noise. While some of these plugins work relly well, they are also pretty expensive, so many people could be turned off by the idea of HDR photos due to this.

Way Too Much Over-saturation. Let's face it most HDR beginners love over saturated surreal photos. Is that what makes good HDR? Most often the answer is no. But when people are learning, this is usually the route they take. By the time they get good enough to know better they've probably given up on learning the art of HDR and moved on to something else. In the end this leads to an over abundance of ugly photos.

Easy to Learn, Difficult to Master. Anyone can throw a few photos into some software, but there are a lot of components that go into a good HDR photograph - many more than with traditional photography. Afterall you need at least three photos, not just one.

Just like with anything else, there are going to be upsides and downsides to HDR. I imagine this will be an ongoing debate as technology advances and it gets easier for people to get into HDR. Despite any potential downsides however, I will remain a big proponent of the technique and look forward to seeing it expand in the coming months and years.




About the Author:



0 comments

Web site development, PHP programming's Fan Box